Faster Exception Resolution
vs. traditional dashboard monitoring
Mean Time to Spatial Lock
bot-to-AR-overlay acquisition
Bots Under AR Observation
across active deployments
Reduction in L2 Escalations
floor-manager resolved, not analyst-queued
Not Real-time-ish
<40ms spatial panel refresh rate
These are the numbers that matter when 200+ software robots are executing across your operation and your team can't see any of them.
AUGMENT v2.4.1 — FEB 2026Your bots are running.
You just can't see them.
The RPA monitoring gap isn't a tooling problem. It's a spatial problem. Dashboards live on screens. Failures live on floors.
of RPA failures go undetected for >4 hours
Silent failures — bot executes, system ignores — produce no error log. The report is blank. No alert fires.
avg. time to isolate exception via dashboard
Operators navigate 4–7 dashboard screens to reconstruct what a bot touched. Floor managers don't open dashboards.
of orchestration dashboards opened <once/week
The tool designed to give visibility is itself invisible. Alerts go to inboxes. Inboxes go unread during shift changes.
of RPA projects fail before reaching 10 bots
Scale is the failure mode. What works at 5 bots becomes unmanageable at 50. Visibility is the missing layer.
| Dimension | Traditional RPA | Augment AR |
|---|---|---|
| Failure Detection Method | Log polling / email alert | Spatial anomaly detection, <2s |
| Floor Manager Access | Requires analyst intermediary | Direct headset or browser view |
| Silent Failure Rate | 73% undetected >4hrs | < 3% miss rate |
| Mean Exception Resolution | 31 minutes | 1.9 minutes |
12 dimensions.
One conclusion.
| Dimension | Column A Traditional RPA Monitoring | Column B Competitor AR Overlay | Column C Augment |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORE AR | |||
| Spatial Resolution | N/A — no spatial layer | 12mm positional accuracy | 2.4mm — sub-centimeter lock |
| Bot-Density Handling | Flat list, no spatial index | Up to 80 bots / floor zone | 400+ bots / zone, LOD culling |
| HARDWARE | |||
| Headset Compatibility | Browser only | HoloLens 2 only | HoloLens 2, Magic Leap 2, Quest Pro, browser |
| PERFORMANCE | |||
| AR Panel Refresh Latency | 15–90s dashboard polling | 800ms–2.1s overlay refresh | <40ms — real-time WebSocket stream |
| INTEGRATIONS | |||
| UiPath Integration Depth | Orchestrator API (read-only) | Orchestrator + Activity feed | Full Orchestrator + step-level telemetry + spatial pin |
| Automation Anywhere Integration | Control Room API basic | No native support | A360 Control Room + IQ Bot spatial overlay |
| Blue Prism Integration | SOAP API legacy | REST API partial | Interact + SS&C native connector, full queue visibility |
| RELIABILITY | |||
| Silent Failure Detection | >4hr avg. detection lag | ~12min detection via log scan | < 8s — spatial anomaly inference |
| USABILITY | |||
| Floor Manager Access | Analyst required, 31min avg. | Tablet UI — 8min avg. | Headset + mobile — 1.9min avg. |
| Exception Taxonomy Display | Log code only | Category label + timestamp | Business vs. App exception, spatial context, suggested fix |
| SCALE | |||
| Multi-Site Spatial Sync | Per-site dashboards, no sync | Single-site only | Global spatial mesh, 12-site max per tenant |
| ONBOARDING | |||
| Setup to First Spatial Pin | 2–6 weeks implementation | 5–10 business days | 3.2s per bot after 4hr initial config |
Data sourced from Augment internal benchmarks (n=340 enterprise deployments), vendor public documentation, and independent third-party evaluation Q4 2025. "Competitor AR Overlay" represents composite of 3 evaluated vendors.
Download full benchmark methodology (.pdf) →Three deployments.
Three data points. No narrative.
The companies below didn't need a case study. They needed their bots to be visible. Here's what happened.
312 UiPath bots across 4 assembly floors. Pre-Augment: 73% of failures undetected >4hrs. Post-Augment: 4.4% miss rate. Floor supervisors resolved 89% of exceptions without L2 escalation.
187 Automation Anywhere bots handling claims processing. IT director's team went from 22 daily escalation tickets to 7. Spatial exception panels surfaced root cause in avg. 1.9 minutes vs. prior 31-minute dashboard investigation.
Blue Prism + UiPath hybrid fleet across 6 distribution centers. COO mandate: floor managers troubleshoot, not analysts. Augment spatial mesh deployed across all 6 sites in 4-hour initial config. Mean time to spatial lock: 3.2s per bot.
Watch your bots materialize
in the air around you.
Browser-based AR simulation. No headset required. Connect a demo UiPath or Automation Anywhere environment and watch spatial panels populate in real time. Takes 4 minutes to first spatial pin.
No headset required — browser-based AR simulation